Script sur un debat entre deux peronnes qui veulent ou ne veulent pas aider les animaux dans les parcs nationaux

Devoir Anglais - Exercice - 2nde

Sujet :

Voila, je dois faire un script d'un debat ou deux personne essayent de savoir si oui ou non il faut aider les animaux dans les parcs nationaux : pouvez-vous corriger des fautes si il y en a ? et me dire si c'est bien? merci !

Où j'en suis :

the first person : I think it’s a very good idea to preserve the wildlife in national parks, it will keep more animals on Earth because many species are endangered without us.
the second person : No, I don’t agree ! preserve wildlife in the parks are going to let
disappear more faster the species !
the first person : no, often the humans help to get back the species that had disappeared.
The second person : your remember the managers of Yellowstone who trying to save the elk ? Everyone know that instead of saving it they made it disappear the vegetation, the wolves and even the beavers.
the first person : But it’s just that the aid hasn’t been given correctly, the directors of the park have made bad décisions : they knew nothing of the animal life
the second person : But who can give a good help to the animals ? wild life is too complicated, no one can know in advance what actions will help the animals and which will make them disapear faster.
the first person : Yes, there are experts for that but it’s that saving animals isn’t an easy task, there must have good teams that will evaluate all the animals and their actions it'll be long! but it’s a good thing, after thèse animals will be saved !
the second person : So it will be very expensive ! all countries can’t pay all the depenses for preserve the wildlife parks, it’s really a waste of money while animals have always been able take care of themselves.
the first person : yes but the animals are less able to protect themselves against their enemies and without our help they will disapear and countries are able to pay very expensive to save these endangered animals, so why not do it ?
the second person : If these animals are no longer able to fend for themselves it’s beacause for many years there were aid and now they are habituated to this help. We need to stop to save they and it will help they better.

Signaler ce devoir abusif

Ce devoir a été fermé par son auteur.

3 personne(s) aide(nt) framboise789 : lilin, tina65, miren75

Attention, verifiez bien la justesse des réponses que l'on vous donne pour votre devoir.

lilin
Bac +4 Autre - 71 points - 09/02/2012 à 08:35

framboise789

2nde

+ Histoire / Anglais

Profil de framboise789

Fin du devoir pour le 13 Février
Script sur un debat entre deux peronnes qui veulent ou ne veulent pas aider les animaux dans les parcs nationaux

Devoir Anglais - Exercice - 2nde

Sujet :

Voila, je dois faire un script d'un debat ou deux personne essayent de savoir si oui ou non il faut aider les animaux dans les parcs nationaux : pouvez-vous corriger des fautes si il y en a ? et me dire si c'est bien? merci !

Où j'en suis :

the first person : I think it’s a very good idea to preserve the wildlife in national parks, it will keep more animals on Earth because many species are endangered without us.
the second person : No, I don’t agree ! (preserve)preserving wildlife in the parks (are)is going to let the species
disappear faster (the species) !
the first person : no, often Humans help to get back the species that (had) have disappeared.
The second person :do remember the managers of Yellowstone who were trying to save the elk ? Everyone knows that instead of saving it they made the vegetation, the wolves and even the beavers disappear
the first person : But it’s just because the aid (hasn’t been (was notgiven correctly, the directors of the park (have made) took bad décisions : they knew nothing of the animal life
the second person : But who can give a good help to the animals ? wild life is too complicated, no one can know in advance what actions will help the animals and (which)what will make them disapear faster.
the first person : Yes, there are experts for that but (it’s that) saving animals isn’t an easy task, there must (have) be good teams that will evaluate all the animals and their actions it'll be long! but it’s a good thing, after thèse animals will be saved !
the second person : So it will be very expensive ! all countries can’t pay all the (depenses for)expenses to preserve the wildlife parks, it’s really a waste of money while animals have always been able to take care of themselves.
the first person : yes but the animals are less able to protect themselves against their enemies and without our help they will disapear and countries are able to pay (very expensive) a lot of money to save these endangered animals, so why not do it ?
the second person : If these animals are no longer able to fend for themselves it’s because for many years there were (aid)helped and now they are (habituated) used to (this help) it. We need to stop (to) saving them and it will( help they better)be more helpful

ce qui est entre parenthèse est à supprimer.